Lairiodd wrote:He was pretty 'lucky', the police seemed to be criminally negligent.
You could say the same about our security services and the tube bombings, it's not as if MI5 didn't know they were involved in terrorism before hand, they just decided to take them off the watch list to prioritise elsewhere. I'm not convinced however that the police in the US really did that much wrong, they questioned the boyfriend of the girl who was shot because he was a known gun lover - to me that sounds like sensible policing, he's a good suspect. If they didn't know who they were looking for and the campus has 26,000 people on it, how were they to find the correct person - especially when there's seemingly no link between Cho and the murdered girl and guy? Even though Cho was known to police, he wasn't known for any kind of violence or gun crime, just sexual harassment type crimes - I don't think you can realistically guess that someone's going to go from taking up skirt pictures of two girls to massacring 32 people.
I don't think it's really something you can solve by better police work, if 20 people in 10 years have gone on a massacre in a country of 300million people how can you possibly figure out which ones it's going to be? They talk about a profile involving people who are depressed, lonely and so forth but I've seen companies where 50% of the workforce fits that bill.